Showing posts with label Vishishthadvaita. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vishishthadvaita. Show all posts

Hinduism - What Is Vivartavada In Hindu Philosophy?

     


    What is the Hindu philosophy of Vivartavada?


    The world is described as an illusory transformation of the Ultimate Reality or Realities, according to this philosophical model.

    The Advaita Vedanta philosophical school is known for its vivartavada model.

    The Advaitins believe in a causal model known as satkaryavada, which assumes that effects already exist in their causes and that when they appear, they are simply transformations (parinama) of those causes.

    Milk is transformed into curds, butter, and clarified butter as a classic example.

    Each of these effects was already present in the cause, according to proponents of asatkarya, and emerges from it through a natural transformation of the cause.

    The Advaita school adheres to the philosophical position of monism, which holds that everything is merely different manifestations of a single Ultimate Reality.



    Despite the appearance of difference and diversity in the world, Advaita proponents claim that reality is nondual (advaita), that is, that all things are "actually" nothing but the formless, unqualified Brahman.

    The Advaitins' belief that an effect already exists in its cause is based on the principle that all things in the universe ultimately rely on Brahman as the first cause.

    Simultaneously, the Advaitins refuse to acknowledge that Brahman ever changes because this would negate its eternal and unchanging nature.

    As a result, they talk about a fictitious transmission (vivartavada).

    The Advaitins believe that Brahman never truly changes because it is eternal and thus unchanging; the apparent changes are only illusory, based on human ignorance through shifting superimposition patterns (adhyasa).

    Advaitins are able to maintain Brahman's transcendence while also accounting for (apparent) changes in the phenomenal world in this way.

    Proponents of a different approach, which portrays the perceivable world as an actual trans creation of this unified reality, argue against this stance.


    Proponents of the Samkhya, Vishishthadvaita Vedanta, and Bhedabhada philosophical traditions, who, like Advaitins, believe in satkaryavada, hold this position.




    Each of these three schools thinks that the world as we see it is real, that it is rooted in a single ultimate source, and that this fundamental principle undergoes a genuine metamorphosis through which the universe is born.

    This parinama connection permits these schools to explain the phenomenal world, but in a manner that undermines the transcendence of these initial principles by incorporating them within it.

    Philosophically, they struggle to explain how the sublime might become commonplace, then transcendent again.


    What is the vivartavada view of Advaita Vedanta?

    According to the post-Shankara Advaita advaitins' vivartavada view of Advaita Vedanta, the cosmos is only a "illusory mutation" of Brahman.


    What does Vivarta mean?

    The Sanskrit term vivarta denotes a change in form, a modification, or a changed circumstance. 

    The word vivarta is the root of the phrase vivartavada.

    The Satkaryavada thesis, which states that the cause precedes the consequence, is accepted by all Vedanta schools

    However, there are several points of view about how Brahman gave rise to the material universe. 




    The concept of parinamavada holds that the universe is a genuine (parinama) metamorphosis of Brahman. 


    • The concept of vivartavada holds that the universe is only a fictitious (vivarta) representation of Brahman. 
    • According to Vivartavada, despite the fact that Brahman seems to alter, nothing really changes. 
    • The multitude of creatures are false manifestations because Brahman, the ultimate truth that is unborn, unchanging, and utterly devoid of any parts, is the only true being.


    The Brahma Sutras, early Vedantins, the majority of Vedanta schools, and Samkhya all support parinamavada. 





    According to Nicholson, the Advaitins, who are devotees of Shankara, are the "most conspicuous champions of Vivartavada." 

    The Advaitins say that before the individual ego may be freed, all of Brahman's consequences must eventually be accepted as unreal, despite the fact that the universe can be represented as conventionally real, continues Nicholson.

    However, academics are divided on whether Adi Shankara and his Advaita theory used vivartavada or parinamavada to explain causation. 




    Adi Shankara did not support Vivartavada, according to scholars like Paul Hacker and Hajime Nakamura, and his justifications are "far from any connotation of illusion." They claim that the concept of Vivarta was given by the scholar Prakasatman, and it is Prakasatman's thesis that is sometimes mistaken for Adi Shankara's perspective. 


    According to Andrew Nicholson, who agrees with Hacker and other academics, Shankara's thoughts are more closely related to parinama-vada than the vivarta-vada, and the vivarta explanation most likely developed gradually in the Advaita sub-school later.


    Casual connection is depicted by Vijnanabhiksu as having three terms: effect, variable locus cause, and immutable locus cause. 

    The locus cause cannot be separated from the changing cause and effect and does not originate in them.


    By proposing the theory of Svatantryavada (the "Universal voluntarism"), which maintains that Effect develops from Cause due to the sovereignty of God's Will, the Pratyabhijna philosophy of Somananda disproves the Arambhvada (the "Realistic view" of the Nyaya-Vaisesika), the Parinamavada (the theory of Transformation of the Sankhya-Yoga), and the Vivart.

    Ramanuja recognizes Prakrti as the material cause, but Madhava disputes this claim since a material cause does not necessarily imply control or supervision. 


    Madhava also disagrees with the Vivartavada because it does not acknowledge the need to account for any effects. 


    In his pure non-dualism (Shuddhadvaita) philosophy, Vallabhacharya also opposes "vivartavada" and asserts that Maya (or the "Jagat") is real and is only a power of Brahman who manifests as Jiva and the world of his own volition. 



    In doing so, there is no transformation of Brahman; it still remains only gold. 

    As a result, Shuddhadvaita is also called as "Avikta Parimavda" (Unmodified transformation).


    Frequently Asked Questions



    What does Vivartavada mean?

    The concept of vivartavada holds that the universe is only a fictitious representation of Brahman. 

    According to Vivartavada, despite the fact that Brahman seems to alter, nothing really changes. The multitude of creatures are false manifestations because Brahman, the ultimate truth that is unborn, unchanging, and utterly devoid of any parts, is the only true being.

    What distinguishes Parinamavada from Vivartavada?

    The non-advaitin doctrine of real change is referred to as parinama-vada.

    Vivartavada, the advaita theory of seeming change, is distinct from this. The idea is that the cause really changes into the consequence.



    References And Further Reading:



    • Majumder, B. and Ray, S., 2022. Rajju Sarpa Bhranti-A Metaphysical Analysis of Visual Illusions in Light of Doctrine of Vivarta Vada. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences7(5), pp.80-90.
    • Sayanolibavan, M., 2022. The importance attributed to Mandukya Karika in the tradition of Advaida Vedanta.
    • Roodurmum, P.S., 2002. Bhåamatåi and Vivaraòna Schools of Advaita Vedåanta a Critical Approach.
    • Chari, S., 2011. Indian Philosophical Systems: A Critical Review Based on Vedānta Deśika's Paramata-Bhaṅga.
    • Majumder, B. and Ray, S., 2022. Doctrines of Different Philosophical Schools Regarding the Theory of Cause & Effect and Their Validation in Light of Charaka Samhita. Journal of Ayurvedic and Herbal Medicine8(2), pp.94-100.
    • Bhattacharyya, S.P., 2000. Sarvajñātmamuni's contribution to Advaita Vedānta.
    • Brooks, R.W., 1963. Śaṁkara: A Psychological Study.
    • Isaeva, N.V., 2009. Vivartavada.
    • Duquette, J., 2015. Is Sivadvaita Vedanta a Saiddhantika School? Parinamavada in the Brahmamimarrisabhasya. Journal of Hindu Studies8(1), pp.16-43.
    • Chaliha, A., 2017. ON SRIBHASYA-THE BASIC BOOK ON THE THEISTIC VEDANTA. The Philosophical Journal of JB College (Autonomous), Jorhat Assam, India, p.10.
    • Goswami, N., The concept of aventa philosophy of Sankaracharya.
    • Singh, P., 2021. The Problem of Causation: Nagarjuna Vs Hume. Journal Of International Buddhist Studies College (JIBSC)7(1), pp.66-75.
    • Gupta, A.S., 1958. Ramanuja on causality. Philosophy East and West8(3/4), pp.137-148.








    Hinduism - Who Was Vishakhadatta?

     



     Vishakhadatta(6th c.), was a Sanskrit playwright, Mudrarakshasa ("Rakshasa's Ring") is his sole extant work.

    The play is historically significant since its central narrative is the ascent of Chandragupta Maurya (r. 321–297 B.C.E. ), the founder of the Maurya dynasty, despite the fact that the play attributes his victory to his crafty brahmin minister, Chanakya.

    Although, in respect to the actual monarch, this picture is wrong, the play portrays the king as a weak character, with the minister as the true power behind the throne.

    The narrative of the drama is convoluted, as is the case with many Sanskrit plays, but the drama's climax occurs when the main protagonists are dramatically saved from execution at the last minute.

    Michael Coulson translated the play into English and released it in the collection Three Sanskrit Plays in 1981.

    Vishishthadvaita ("Qualified Non-Dualism") is a Sanskrit word that means "qualified non-dualism." Vedanta One of the branches of Vedanta, the philosophical school that claims to reveal the Vedas' ultimate meaning and purpose (anta), the Hindu religious texts' oldest and most authoritative texts.

    The greatest figure in Vishishthadvaita is Ramanuja, an eleventh-century philosopher who was central to its formulation, despite the fact that he was building on earlier work.

    Ramanuja believed that Brahman, or Supreme Reality, was a personal god rather than an impersonal abstract concept, and that the most significant kind of religious activity was devotion (bhakti).

    His philosophical viewpoint, Vishishthadvaita Vedanta, emphasized both of these ideas, and so contrasted with the Advaita Vedanta school, created by the philosopher Shankaracharya.

    The Advaita school adheres to the philosophical position of monism, or the belief in a single impersonal Ultimate Reality, which they refer to as Brahman.

    Despite the appearance of difference and variety in the perceivable world, Advaita adherents believe that reality is "nondual" (advaita), meaning that all things are nothing but the formless Brahman.

    This assumption of diversity, according to Advaitins, is a fundamental misunderstanding of the ultimate nature of things, as well as a manifestation of avidya.

    Although avidya is often translated as "ignorance," it is better understood as a lack of genuine understanding that leads to karmic bonding, rein carnation (samsara), and suffering.

    Because the real issue for Advaitins is a misunderstanding, realization (jnana) was the best spiritual path to achieve ultimate liberation (moksha).

    The material universe and self have genuine and autonomous existence, according to Ramanuja's formulation, while their existence is ultimately anchored in God, whom he names as Vishnu.

    The world emerges from God through an evolutionary process based on the Samkhya model, but because matter is unconscious, it is both similar to and dissimilar to God.

    Human beings are similar to God in that they have God as their source, but they differ from him in that they are subject to ignorance and suffering.

    God, according to Ramanuja and his followers, is not the same as ourselves or the world, which are all thought to have real and independent existence.

    In a way that the Advaita proponents will never concede, this notion of identity and difference makes the perceptible world real.

    Ramanuja's stance differs from that of a later thinker, Madhva, whose Dvaita Vedanta emphasized the enormous chasm between God and all else.

    Because of the disparity in capacities between the god and the devotee (bhakta), Ramanuja and his followers have emphasized bhakti as the most effective route of redemption.

    Even after freedom, souls maintain enough separation from God to allow devotion; liberation is seen as a perpetual relationship with God rather than a loss of individuality.

    For further detail, read John Braisted Carman's The Theology of Ramanuja, published in 1974, and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore's A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, published in 1957.


    Kiran Atma


    You may also want to read more about Hinduism here.

    Be sure to check out my writings on religion here.


    Hinduism - Who Was Vedanta Deshika?

     


    Vedanta Deshika(13th c.) was a writer and commentator in the Vishishthadvaita Vedanta philosophical school.


    Vedanta Deshika was a follower of Ramanuja and interpreted Ramanuja as teaching that there were two sorts of liberation: 


    1. a lower one in which one was subject to no outside forces, 
    2. and a higher one in which one’s entire being was focused on the Lord, whom Ramanuja identified as the god Vishnu.


    The human being is considered both identical to and different from the Lord, which means the perfect identity is never possible; God’s transcendence leads to the exaltation of devotion (bhakti) and the stress on submission to God’s grace.


    ~Kiran Atma


    You may also want to read more about Hinduism here.

    Be sure to check out my writings on religion here.




    Hinduism - What Is Vedanta School Of Hindu Philosophy?

     

    The sixth and most recent of traditional Hindu philosophy's six schools.


    Vedanta literally translates to "the end of the Vedas," reflecting their belief that they were unveiling the final meaning of these ancient books.


    The Upanishads, which were also the final layer of Vedic books, and therefore their "end" in a different sense, were given special attention by Vedanta proponents.

    Several prominent schools with significantly differing philosophical perspectives have used these works as authoritative sources.

    The Advaita Vedanta school, founded by the philosopher Shankaracharya and his disciples, is the most well-known and influential of them.


    The Advaita school adheres to the philosophical viewpoint of monism, or the belief in a single impersonal Ultimate Reality known as Brahman.

    Despite the appearance of distinction and diversity, Advaita proponents believe that reality is "nondual" (advaita), that is, all things are nothing but the formless, unqualified Brahman.

    This assumption of variety, according to Advaitins, is a basic misunderstanding of the ultimate essence of things, as well as a sign of avidya.

    Although frequently translated as "ignorance," avidya is more accurately defined as a lack of genuine understanding that traps humans in karmic bonds, reincarnation (samsara), and suffering.

    Unlike the Advaita school, which views the Ultimate Reality in abstract, impersonal terms, the other Vedanta schools are theistic, in that they regard the Ultimate Reality as a personal God, namely Vishnu.


    The two other major schools are the Vishishthadvaita vedanta (“qualified nondualism”) pro pounded by Ramanuja and the Dvaita Vedanta (“dualist”) propounded by Madhva.


    The major differences between these two schools stem from assumptions about connections between God, human souls, and the world.

    Ramanuja tends to see these in a continuum, with the world and human souls sharing in the divine nature, whereas Madhva stresses the great gulf between God and all other things.

    Another minor school is the dvaitadvaita vedanta (“dualism and nondualism”) of Nimbarka, which strives to find some middle ground between Advaita Vedanta’s monism, and Dvaita Vedanta’s dualism.

    Nimbarka stressed that the world and souls were dependent on God, in whom they exist, and with whom they had a subtle connection.

    Even from their names, it is obvious that there are significant differences between these positions.


    ~Kiran Atma


    You may also want to read more about Hinduism here.

    Be sure to check out my writings on religion here.